Case No. 820/2012 M/s. Naman Equipments & Construction (India) (P)
Ltd., 115, Diamond Trade Centre, Diamond Colony, Indore. Residential &
Commercial Project “Nariman Point” Village – Pipliya Kumar, Tehsil &
Distt. Indore (M.P.)
This is a building construction project proposed in a plot area of 18.89 hectare
with total built-up area of 25,132.62 Sq.mt. The project requires prior EC under
the provisions of EIA Notification 2006 & its amendments as it is mentioned at
S.N. 8 (a) of the schedule of the said notification. The case was forwarded by the
SEIAA to SEAC for appraisal.
Features of the project:
Railway Indore Railway Station is about 8.5 km away from the
site.
Road Nearest Highway is NH-3 at a Arial distance of 1.2
Km away from the site.
Airport Devi Ahillyabai Holkar Airport is approx. 16km away
from the site.
Nearest Fire Station Nearest fire station is 9.0 Km away from the site.
STATE EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF 231st. MEETING
27/10/2015
Page39
Area Statement: Total land area = 18890.00 sq.mt (1.889 hect)
Area under road widening = 600.00 sq.mt
Net land area = 18890-600 = 18290.00 sq.mt
Green area =1,829 sq.mt (10.0 %).
Proposed extra green area = 2011.9 sq.mt(11 %)
Ground coverage = 5487.00 sq.mt (30%)
Salient feature of the project
Total Area of the Plot : 18890.00 SQ. MT (1.889 HECT)
Proposed Built –Up Area : 25132.62 sq.m.
Land Use : Residential & Commercial
Total No. Of Units : 684 flats (3 BHK: 252 nos., 2 BHK: 264 nos., 1BHK: 132 nos., EWS: 36 nos. Commercial Shop: 5 nos. and a Club house.
Total Number of Blocks : 8 Maximum height of the building :18 M (P+6) Total Water Demand : 548 KLD STP Capacity : 381 KLD for Residential Solid Waste Generation : 1.752 TPD Power Demand : 1.787 MW (1787.6 KW.) Back Up Source : 137 KW, 1 x 171.2 KVA The case was presented in 104th SEAC meeting 28/09/2012. The presentation was made by the PP and his consultant. After deliberations PP was asked to submit response to the following queries raised by the committee: 1. A letter from TNCP & Municipal Corporation to be furnished stating that the permissions issued by these departments have been transferred in name of the present proponent of the project. 2. An affidavit has to be provided stating that all rights have been transferred to M/s Naman Equipments & Construction (India) Pvt. Ltd. 3. Memorandum of Article as Registered Private Company to be furnished. STATE EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 231st. MEETING 27/10/2015 Page40 4. Specification of MSW storage facility with provision to hold the MSW at least for 48 hours to be furnished. 5. Ground water recharging has been proposed in the project; in this context figures and calculations for net recharge / net drop-down to be furnished based on the hydro-geology of the region. 6. Car parking space has to be re-calculated comparing the norms of CPCB and State authority. 7. Water supply from ground as well as from Municipal Corporation has been opted in the project; in this context PP is required to submit permission from CGWA as well as from Indore Municipal Corporation along with the time line for completion of Narbada water scheme. 8. Locations of STP, MSW storage area and bins have to be relocated such that the transfer of wastes can be facilitated with minimum disturbance to the residents of the township. 9. Provision for play ground has to be explored and furnished. 10. Provision of corpus funds for O & M of STP and other environmental issues has to be made in the project. PP has submitted the reply of above quarries vides their letter dated 08/04/2013. As the case was pending since long, SEAC in its 169th meeting dated 27/01/15 recommended the case for delisting. SEIAA vide letter no. 1530 dated 01/06/15 asked that “whether the query reply submitted by PP was considered in any of the meetings”. The case was placed for the discussion in this meeting but neither the Project Proponent (PP) nor his representative was present to explain the query which might be raised or to make any commitment which may be desired by the committee during the deliberation. The PP may therefore be given another opportunity to present his case failing which the case may be recommended for delisting. Dr. R. B. Lal Chairman
Area Statement: Total land area = 18890.00 sq.mt (1.889 hect)
Area under road widening = 600.00 sq.mt
Net land area = 18890-600 = 18290.00 sq.mt
Green area =1,829 sq.mt (10.0 %).
Proposed extra green area = 2011.9 sq.mt(11 %)
Ground coverage = 5487.00 sq.mt (30%)
Salient feature of the project
Total Area of the Plot : 18890.00 SQ. MT (1.889 HECT)
Proposed Built –Up Area : 25132.62 sq.m.
Land Use : Residential & Commercial
Total No. Of Units : 684 flats (3 BHK: 252 nos., 2 BHK: 264 nos., 1BHK: 132 nos., EWS: 36 nos. Commercial Shop: 5 nos. and a Club house.
Total Number of Blocks : 8 Maximum height of the building :18 M (P+6) Total Water Demand : 548 KLD STP Capacity : 381 KLD for Residential Solid Waste Generation : 1.752 TPD Power Demand : 1.787 MW (1787.6 KW.) Back Up Source : 137 KW, 1 x 171.2 KVA The case was presented in 104th SEAC meeting 28/09/2012. The presentation was made by the PP and his consultant. After deliberations PP was asked to submit response to the following queries raised by the committee: 1. A letter from TNCP & Municipal Corporation to be furnished stating that the permissions issued by these departments have been transferred in name of the present proponent of the project. 2. An affidavit has to be provided stating that all rights have been transferred to M/s Naman Equipments & Construction (India) Pvt. Ltd. 3. Memorandum of Article as Registered Private Company to be furnished. STATE EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 231st. MEETING 27/10/2015 Page40 4. Specification of MSW storage facility with provision to hold the MSW at least for 48 hours to be furnished. 5. Ground water recharging has been proposed in the project; in this context figures and calculations for net recharge / net drop-down to be furnished based on the hydro-geology of the region. 6. Car parking space has to be re-calculated comparing the norms of CPCB and State authority. 7. Water supply from ground as well as from Municipal Corporation has been opted in the project; in this context PP is required to submit permission from CGWA as well as from Indore Municipal Corporation along with the time line for completion of Narbada water scheme. 8. Locations of STP, MSW storage area and bins have to be relocated such that the transfer of wastes can be facilitated with minimum disturbance to the residents of the township. 9. Provision for play ground has to be explored and furnished. 10. Provision of corpus funds for O & M of STP and other environmental issues has to be made in the project. PP has submitted the reply of above quarries vides their letter dated 08/04/2013. As the case was pending since long, SEAC in its 169th meeting dated 27/01/15 recommended the case for delisting. SEIAA vide letter no. 1530 dated 01/06/15 asked that “whether the query reply submitted by PP was considered in any of the meetings”. The case was placed for the discussion in this meeting but neither the Project Proponent (PP) nor his representative was present to explain the query which might be raised or to make any commitment which may be desired by the committee during the deliberation. The PP may therefore be given another opportunity to present his case failing which the case may be recommended for delisting. Dr. R. B. Lal Chairman
No comments:
Post a Comment